When people talk about green cryptocurrency, a blockchain project designed to use minimal energy and reduce carbon emissions. Also known as sustainable crypto, it’s meant to fix the biggest criticism of Bitcoin: how much electricity it eats. Not every coin that says "eco-friendly" actually is. Some just slap a leaf on their logo and call it a day. Real green cryptocurrency changes how it validates transactions—swapping energy-hungry proof-of-work for smarter methods like proof-of-stake, proof-of-history, or even off-chain processing.
Take proof-of-stake, a consensus method where validators are chosen based on how much crypto they hold and are willing to "stake" as collateral. This cuts energy use by over 99% compared to Bitcoin mining. Ethereum switched to this in 2022, and now it’s the standard for new projects aiming to be green. Then there’s carbon-neutral crypto, coins that offset their remaining emissions by funding real-world reforestation or renewable energy projects. These aren’t just claims—they’re backed by third-party audits and public ledger tracking. But here’s the catch: many tokens labeled "green" are micro-cap scams with zero real infrastructure. They don’t run their own blockchain. They’re just ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum, riding the sustainability trend. If a coin has no public energy report, no transparent mining or staking rules, and no verifiable carbon credits, it’s not green—it’s greenwashing.
What you’ll find in this collection isn’t hype. It’s the truth about which crypto projects actually care about the planet, which ones are dead or fake, and how to spot the difference. You’ll see reviews of exchanges that claim to be eco-friendly but aren’t, airdrops that promise green rewards but deliver nothing, and tokens that sound like the future but are already dead. No fluff. No marketing buzzwords. Just what works, what doesn’t, and why it matters for your wallet and the planet.
SavePlanetEarth (SPE) is an Ethereum-based crypto claiming to fight climate change by funding tree planting and carbon capture. But with low liquidity, no verified impact, and questionable partnerships, it's more speculation than solution.